Home
Warren Ellis - The Patchwork Years [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Warren Ellis

[ website | warrenelliscom ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| warrenellisdotcom myspace badsignal ]

The Patchwork Years [Jul. 6th, 2008|11:37 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry

The years 2001-2007, approximately, on the web were the crazy years. The patchwork years. The years the web was massively and chaotically pumped full of Stuff. 1995-2001 were pretty crazy, of course, but they were checked by connection speed and the limitations of personal publishing. By 2002, broadband was happening over a broader swathe of the world, and blogging had bitten in. Followed by the takeup of bit torrent, YouTube, podcasting, and every other damn thing.

One of the few sane responses to this explosion of production was to assume the role of curator. (Other sane responses include moving to the woods and considering a completion of the work Ted Kaczynski started.) The two most famous examples of same are Jorn Barger’s Robot Wisdom (est. 1997) — Barger is said to have coined the term "weblog" — and Mark Frauenfelder’s Boing Boing (est. 2000 as a weblog, previously a print magazine est. 1988), co-produced for much of its life by Cory Doctorow, David Pescovitz, and Xeni Jardin. The latter, in particular, has spawned countless imitators, all deeply involved in doing the web-work of 2001-2007 — sorting out all the weird crap that’s out there and re-presenting it in some kind of ordered and aesthetically or politically filtered manner for our consideration.

My own filter, on the site diepunyhumans.com from 2002-2004 before I moved that side of things to warrenellis.com, was simply gathering research material. It had occurred to me that if I gathered my internet-based research on to a searchable database — something as simple as a blog — I’d have access to it anywhere I could get an internet connection. Which, for someone who usually travels with mobile devices, was kind of a big deal. And so I’ve found myself calling up reference through a Web TV five thousand miles from home while writing on a Treo handheld device and foldout keyboard in order to meet a deadline, before now.

In the shift from there to warrenellis.com, I’ve taken great pleasure in reporting the doings of my network of mad and beautiful acquaintances, further personalising the curation process. But it is, regardless, a curation process.

Anyway. That’s been the job of half the web, for the last several years — collating links from the other half of the web. Last year, I started getting a little itchy about this.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could stand up now and say, okay, these are the post-curation years? The world does not need another linkblog. What is required, frankly, is what we’re supposed to call “content” these days. When I were a lad, back in the age of steam, we called this “original material.” Put another way: we like it when Cory and Xeni are the copy/paste editors for the internet, but we like it better when Cory writes a book and Xeni makes an episode of BoingBoingTV.

(In fact, if you read any of the abhorrent comments threads on BoingBoing, you could be forgiven for coming away with the notion that its readership would be happy if it shut down tomorrow.)

(It’s also notable, I think, that my favourite “new” groupblogs — Ectomo, Coilhouse, Inferior4+1 — don’t just link and go. But anyway.)

And, frankly, no-one’s going to do a better job of being the internet’s copy/paste editors than the BB crew anyway. They have the time, they have the money, they have the setup, they have the audience and they have the momentum of nearly a decade in the job. Nobody needs another linkblog like that. There are already thousands of them. The job of curation is being taken care of. Look ahead.

The weblog has evolved to the point where, today, it’s possibly the most effective way of transmitting material that any of us could have imagined. Look at Tumblr. It’s the easiest thing in the world for writers to use — and also artists, photographers, videographers, spoken-word artists, musicians and a dozen other things. Imagine a jewellery maker, a laptop musician, a performance artist, a cartoonist and a short-story writer getting together on a single Tumblr to make themselves an internet channel. The tools are all there, baked right into the site for free. Not groupblogging so much as groupcasting.

And with a million people all madly curating the web — in many cases, trying to put your link in their curational record before someone else does — getting linked up isn’t exactly hard any more. These aren’t the days of begging for space on someone’s jumpstation anymore.

The above is, as Simon Reynolds puts it, “not fully baked.” I want to come back to this once I’ve cleared this flu out of my system — which is why I have this bottle of whisky — and cleared out some of the work backlog.

(Automatically crossposted from warrenellis.com. Feel free to comment here or at my internet church at Whitechapel. If anything in this post looks weird, it's because LJ is run on steampipes and rubber bands -- please click through to the main site.)
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]rfrancis
2008-07-06 10:51 pm (UTC)

(Link)

And this is why I don't have a blog as such; when I do, it will be to say things, not to report other people saying things. (Obviously I do have a livejournal, but when I say things here, I'm saying things about myself; I also have a podcast and a tumblelog and indeed both are, as you put it, me curating. So I am no less guilty than anyone else -- I merely compartmentalize and thus say "I don't have a blog as such and won't until I have something to say.")
[User Picture]From: [info]autodidactic
2008-07-06 10:56 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I had a lot of whiskey last night. It too was to clear out the sickness in preparation for the words. The words are finally coming again.

I'm still trying to find my own niche. Still trying to stay frosty. Writers are a dime a dozen in this town.
[User Picture]From: [info]stampedo
2008-07-06 11:39 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I think we might still be one more great leap in bandwidth away from doing what you're suggesting properly, Warren, but once it happens... yes, it's going to be pretty fantastic.

May booze vanquish your malady.
[User Picture]From: [info]crisper
2008-07-07 12:59 am (UTC)

(Link)

"All web sites will consist entirely of hotlinks pages which list the best hotlinks pages out there. Bad hotlinks pages will be nothing but a list of names; decent ones will have pictures relevant to the place, the topic, the general demeanor of each destination link. The really top-notch hotlinks pages will have highly interactive forms, which you customize to get exactly the set of hotlinks you want.

There will be no information or content. There will only be hotlinks which collect the best hotlinks available.

Two years, tops."

- me, on talk.bizarre, 26 December 1994.

Everything runs in cycles. Even things running for the very first time.
[User Picture]From: [info]stanleylieber
2008-07-07 02:59 am (UTC)

hierarchy

(Link)

[User Picture]From: [info]inri33
2008-07-07 02:06 am (UTC)

(Link)

I like it when you write directly about the Internet.
[User Picture]From: [info]gotham_bound
2008-07-07 05:42 am (UTC)

(Link)

And who's to say one can't invent a new narrative by collecting old information? Pundits on that antiquated medium, television, have been doing it for ages. Now we take it to a new level.

Less cynically, I take heart from wikis and ARGs which seem to be digging at a format that the Internet medium seems uniquely qualified to show off. One Web site may simply organize the content around one specific project, but it may require the one Web site to act as a prism to refract and thus parse all of the content in the given project. Hopefully that made some kind of sense. The more I look into ARGs the more it makes my head buzz (like keep me up quite late, buzzing) and I wish I had a ton of money to create a living art installation*.


*In this era "installation" may be the wrong word.
[User Picture]From: [info]rattsu
2008-07-08 01:43 am (UTC)

(Link)

You put words to my own feelings.

It's just not that easy to start, is it? Paper is lovely, texturized, you can touch and feel and rearrange it. For many people, including me, there are still limits to the web.

Limits to the flat computer screen.

Limits that I suppose I should work to overcome.

Thank you for the push in the right direction.
[User Picture]From: [info]jak2021
2008-07-08 04:37 am (UTC)

(Link)

I feel like I just read a monolog of spider discussing changes to tech life after coming back from the mountain.

Nailed it though, the gestalt creation of a combined personal vision has unbridled power - as evidenced in any production wherein the group just 'clicks', any cult following something gathers, and every individual the end resullt changes.

thanks for it all, and I can't wait for more; another book brewing? I simply orgasm at the slightest thought of it.